THE USE AND PERCEPTION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COURSE

Authors

  • Valdemiro Dielle Dias Junior
  • Jaqueline Luciana Dielle Teixeira
  • Altemar Sales de Oliveira
  • Rosa Amelita Sá Menezes da Motta
  • João Batista Lopes Coelho Junior
  • Gioliano Barbosa Bertoni
  • Jorge Adrihan do Nascimento de Moraes
  • Diego Ramos Inácio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n4-129

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, Software Engineering, AI Ethics, Content Analysis

Abstract

The rapid diffusion of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has significantly impacted higher education, particularly in technology-based programs such as Software Engineering. This study analyzes the pedagogical potential, ethical challenges, and governance gaps associated with the use of GAI in this context, employing Content Analysis of the 16 scientific studies selected through a PRISMA-structured review protocol.As a complementary step, external documentary validation was conducted using normative and reference documents (Brazilian National Curricular Guidelines for computing courses DCNs SWEBOK, UNESCO AI competency framework for teachers, and illustrative course syllabi; Section 5.4) to support the proposed model.Findings indicate that GAI functions both as a coding tutor and as an agent of personalized learning, while simultaneously exposing risks related to statistical bias, technical opacity, and the “transparency paradox” in assessment practices. As an original contribution, the study proposes the concept of the “Opacity-Bias-Paradox Nexus”, which synthesizes the main contemporary challenge for competency evaluation in software engineering education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARAÚJO, H. C.; SANTOS, A. T.; SABINO, G. F. T. Percepção docente sobre o uso da IA na educação básica: revisão da literatura. SciELO Preprints, [S. l.], 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.12454. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

ARRUDA, E. P. Inteligência artificial generativa no contexto da transformação do trabalho docente. Educação em Revista, Belo Horizonte, v. 40, p. e48078, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-469848078. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

BARDIN, L. Análise de conteúdo. Tradução de L. A. Reto e A. Pinheiro. São Paulo: Edições 70, 2016. Disponível em: https://ia802902.us.archive.org/8/items/bardin-laurence-analise-de-conteudo/bardin-laurence-analise-de-conteudo.pdf. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2026.

COLLIN, S.; LEPAGE, A.; NEBEL, L. Enjeux éthiques et critiques de l’intelligence artificielle en éducation: une revue systématique de la littérature. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, [S. l.], v. 49, n. 4, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/28448. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

DU PLOOY, E.; CASTELEIJN, D.; FRANZSEN, D. Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: a scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. Heliyon, [S. l.], v. 10, e39630, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

FERNANDES, A. B. et al. A ética no uso de inteligência artificial na educação: implicações para professores e estudantes. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, São Paulo, v. 10, n. 3, p. 346–361, mar. 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v10i3.13056. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

HOLMES, W.; BIALIK, M.; FADEL, C. Artificial intelligence in education. In: Data ethics: building trust – how digital technologies can serve humanity. [S. l.]: Globethics Publications, 2023. p. 621-653. Disponível em: https://www.globethics.net/documents/428993/428994/GlobethicsPublication978-2-88939-621-3.pdf. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2026.

JAUHIAINEN, J. S.; GUERRA, A. G. Generative AI and education: dynamic personalization of pupils' school learning material with ChatGPT. Frontiers in Education, [S. l.], v. 9, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

KITCHENHAM, B.; CHARTERS, S. Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report EBSE 2007-001. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report, 2007. Disponível em: https://drhariz.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Guidelines-for-performing-SLR-Software-Engineering.pdf Acesso em: 11 abr. 2026.

LAMB, L. C. Ética em IA e IA ética: prolegômenos e estudo de casos significativos. Revista USP, São Paulo, n. 141, p. 107-120, abr./jun. 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9036.i141p107-120. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

MATTOZO, E.; CARDOZO, P. F. Desafios éticos e inovações pedagógicas: a inteligência artificial na educação contemporânea. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, São Paulo, v. 10, n. 11, p. 380-401, nov. 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.51891/rease.v10i11.16497. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

NEUMANN, A. T. et al. An LLM-driven chatbot in higher education for databases and information systems. IEEE Transactions on Education, [S. l.], v. 68, n. 1, p. 103–120, fev. 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2024.3467912. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

OECD. The potential impact of artificial intelligence on equity and inclusion in education. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2024. (EDU/WKP(2024)15). Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1787/15df715b-en. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2026.

OUZZANI, M. et al. Rayyan — a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 210, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2025.

SAMOILI, S. et al. AI Watch: defining artificial intelligence – towards an operational definition and taxonomy of artificial intelligence. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2760/039321. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2026.

SANTAELLA, L. A inteligência artificial sob a égide da ética. Cronos: Revista da Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais, Natal, v. 26, n. 1, p. 8-19, jan./jun. 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21680/1982-5560.2025v26n1ID39309. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2025.

SELWYN, N. Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019. Disponível em: https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9781509528053. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2026.

UNESCO. AI competency framework for teachers. Paris: UNESCO, 2025. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084. Acesso em: 28 mar. 2026.

VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, [S. l.], v. 84, n. 2, p. 523-538, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0146-3. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2026.

WILLIAMSON, B.; KOMLJENOVIC, J.; GULSON, K. N. (ed.). World yearbook of education 2024: digitalisation of education in the era of algorithms, automation and artificial intelligence. London: Routledge, 2024. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003377340. Acesso em: 11 abr. 2026.

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Dias Junior, V. D., Teixeira, J. L. D., de Oliveira, A. S., da Motta, R. A. S. M., Coelho Junior, J. B. L., Bertoni, G. B., de Moraes, J. A. do N., & Inácio, D. R. (2026). THE USE AND PERCEPTION OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A CONTENT ANALYSIS IN THE SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COURSE. Revista De Geopolítica, 17(4), e2207. https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n4-129